The free library174 of 195 Justice & policing
Misconduct in public office
Common law
A public officer, acting as such, wilfully neglecting their duty or wilfully misconducting themselves so seriously that it abuses the public's trust in the office, without reasonable excuse or justification.
Misconduct in public office · Common lawCard 174 / 195
Points to prove
Say them out loud first. Then tap each one to check.
- A public officer
- Acting as such
- Wilfully neglected to perform their duty and/or wilfully misconducted themselves
- To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public's trust in the office holder
- Without reasonable excuse or justification
Misconduct in public office: questions people ask
What are the points to prove for misconduct in public office?
1. A public officer 2. Acting as such 3. Wilfully neglected to perform their duty and/or wilfully misconducted themselves 4. To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public's trust in the office holder 5. Without reasonable excuse or justification
What is the maximum sentence for misconduct in public office?
Life imprisonment.
Is misconduct in public office a summary, either-way or indictable offence?
Misconduct in public office is indictable only: it can only be tried in the Crown Court.
Is misconduct in public office a statutory offence?
No. Misconduct in public office is an offence at common law, defined by the courts rather than an Act of Parliament.
More offences against justice and the police
- Failing to disclose information about terrorismTerrorism Act 2000, s.38B
- Breach of a restraining orderSentencing Act 2020, s.363
- Breach of a domestic abuse protection orderDomestic Abuse Act 2021, s.39
- Perverting the course of justiceCommon law
- Impersonating a police officerPolice Act 1996, s.90
- Attempting to commit an offenceCriminal Attempts Act 1981, s.1
- Intentionally encouraging or assisting an offenceSerious Crime Act 2007, s.44
- ConspiracyCriminal Law Act 1977, s.1